I love reading a good fisking but I’ve seldom done one on the blog with only this one coming up in a search. The following article about the Latin Mass appeared in the National Catholic Register in November last year and I can not believe it was published. It is a series of assertions, anecdotes and hearsay with almost no substance to back any of it up. It is worth going through the article as a whole because it really is something else. Sections of the article will be quoted in italics and the rest will be my own.
The full article can be found here.
One culture within the Catholic Church needing major reform is that surrounding the practice of the Latin Mass.
By “reform” she means “suppression”.
In a previous era, the Latin Mass was merely a uniform and standard way of celebrating the liturgy in the United States. In the wake of much needed reforms instituted by the Second Vatican Council, the Latin Mass has become a rallying point for change-resistant sects within the church. The ultra-conservatism practiced by these Latin Mass groups is radical and narrow-minded. They utilize the Latin Mass structure to wield control over believers — particularly women, who are reduced to a state of discriminatory subjugation in Latin rites. The stubbornly resistant, anti-modern practices of these Latin Mass adherents border on cultism.
None of the assertions here will be backed up at any point in the rant that follows.
The Latin Mass fosters clericalist structures in the church. The liturgy — spoken in an ancient language no longer in modern vernacular usage — places all power in the hands of the priest. The priest keeps his back turned to the people for most of the ceremony. Aside from making occasional responses, the congregation plays no active part in worship. All people inside the church are expected to kneel on cue at various points. The priest is at the center of the spectacle. He is separated from the people he is supposed to serve by an altar rail — a barrier that gives him privileges. To receive the Eucharist, people must kneel at his feet.
This is just a negatively toned description of the liturgy. There are plenty of resources that carefully explain the practice of the Mass that I can fairly assume the author is ignoring completely. For example, the priest and the laity are facing Jesus Christ. Jesus is the focus of the Mass, not the priest or the people. Nothing that follows indicates the author would be interested in having any of this explained to her though.
Further, if you use language like she employs here, you can make anything sound bad. Just imagine writing in the same tone about a classroom or a doctor’s surgery and see how silly it would sound.
“The classroom fosters the pedagogical structures of the school. The curriculum places all power in the hands of the teacher. The teacher stands before the students and they must sit before her. To participate in class the students must raise the hand and hope the teacher condescends to select them. They must do all the work given by the teacher and if they don’t, they will fail. She is separated by them with her own larger desk and a much more comfortable chair. If a child simply wants to go to the toilet, they must beg the teacher for permission.”
I could actually re-write this entire article as an absurd attack on modern schooling and it would still be more reasonable than what is presented here.
Meanwhile, the Latin tradition oppresses women. Women are expected — indeed, in some cases commanded — to wear skirts instead of trousers, cover themselves with long clothing and wear veils over their heads. No such rules exist for the men. It is discrimination, and therefore the Latin Mass actively endorses sexism. Instead of a unifying form of worship, the Latin Mass has become an instrument of oppression and a gathering point for Catholic fundamentalists.
If you hadn’t gathered already, this is about where you discover that this is really all about the author. Nobody has to go to the Latin Mass and no women are forced to wear veils as she readily admits. It is ridiculous to describe this as oppression — especially when the vast majority of Catholic Churches don’t even offer Latin Mass. Most people have to take active steps to find one and often travel great distances to attend them.
Further, this is all irrelevant anyway. Call me a medieval cultist (and she will), but there is no such thing as feminism, equality or sexism in Christianity. Men and women are not the same and have different roles and expectations concerning modesty. If you have a problem with this, you really have a problem with God and should take it up with him. Yes — Him.
In most cases, it is useless to politely disagree with people in the Latin Mass sect. Their attitude creates blindness — not only to true faith, but to their own behavior. They treat others with pride and animosity, but their conscience fails to kick in because they are convinced their way is holy and other ways are not.
This is projection. In reality, everything written here applies to the author. At no point in this article does she genuinely engage in argument about the Latin Mass. She just makes assertions and shares some of her bad experiences. Bad experiences that you will soon see aren’t bad at all.
I would allow that there are prideful and even nasty people that attend Latin Mass but the same would be true anywhere to varying degrees.
Anyone who may accuse me of not knowing what I’m talking about — a favorite indictment of the Latin Mass ideologues — would be wrong. My opinion is based on facts and personal experiences.
They would be right and almost everything written is based on personal experiences and not facts. Some of these personal experiences probably aren’t even true but we’ll come to that shortly.
I grew up in a household of challenged but growing faith, which grew stronger over time. My parents were divorced. My mother was a fallen-away Catholic who hadn’t been to church in over 30 years. In the branches of my family tree were relatives who might best be described as atheists, and others of a more traditional Christian type. My mother decided to return to the Catholic Church when I was young. From an early age, I believed in Christ and considered myself a Catholic — other relatives tried in vain to convert me to atheism while I was still in elementary school.
I am genuinely sorry for her troubled upbringing but this has nothing to do with the Catholic Church or the Latin Mass. All of this happened outside of the church.
Maybe this sounds like the beginning of a happy story of faith and discovery. It was not. My family’s journey into the Catholic Church was a long, tumultuous and unpleasant road punctuated by a series of awful mistreatments by Catholic clergy, religious, schools and parishioners. (It’s a miracle that I’m still Catholic and became a Catholic journalist.)
A miracle would be ostensibly Catholic publications ceasing to publish turgid rants by people who hate everything about the church before the Second Vatican Council.
The Latin Mass rears its veiled head in this unholy history at several points. The last Masses my mother remembered attending took place before the Second Vatican Council, so naturally she started going to Latin Masses when she returned to the church because they were familiar. The church was going to welcome us, she thought. The treatment we got was slightly shy of the Spanish Inquisition.
She continues to build up and piles on the hyperbole. The treatment must have been really something awful. Like most Latin Mass cultists, I am disgusted by the horrible abuses committed by the clergy and want it stamped out and atoned for. What happened to her and her family must have been truly horrible.
Needless to say, anything in the church looking remotely female was completely veiled. The people had the humor of a gallows crowd and the pastor, arrayed in lavish vestments, was more like a Renaissance baron. After over an hour spent every Sunday drowning in incense smoke and getting sneered at, we did not feel any closer to God.
Would any sane person compare this to the Spanish Inquisition?
Rules, also, were a strange issue. For example, the color red was forbidden to be worn in the church. A confessor there hit one of my family members with a “permanent daily penance”— a rosary every day, forever, to atone for an alleged life of iniquity. After some while of this torture, my mother spoke with a different priest about the unbearable situation. He advised her that genuine Catholic faith did not forbid wearing certain colors or allow priests to inflict a “lifetime penance” for sins. Immediately we stopped going to Mass at that parish.
Remember, just a few paragraphs up she mentioned “a series of awful mistreatments by Catholic clergy, religious, schools and parishioners.” So far we have red being forbidden, incense, veils and lavish vestments. That permanent daily penance sounds quite austere but nothing that consultation with another priest or perhaps a bishop wouldn’t remedy — as she did. Many Catholics (including myself), pray the Rosary every day. She describes this as “torture” and compares it to the Spanish Inquisition.
Many Catholics have genuinely suffered abuse and this ridiculous rant completely trivialises actual suffering.
But it wasn’t the last time I would run into Latin Masses — or the Latin Mass sectarians, present today in many Catholic organizations.
A reminder that nothing she has written could be described as anything worse than “strict” so far.
After almost leaving the church as a teenager, I chose to stay Catholic by practicing my faith as a free agent — belonging to no parish, attending different churches for Sunday Mass. On one instance, a priest noticed I was showing up semi-regularly and approached me with a persuasive speech to convert me to the Latin Mass faction — disguising discrimination as encouragement. “You should come to the Latin Mass instead and wear a veil. Women look the most beautiful in church when they are veiled,” he tried to persuade. “The long veils are the best kind — the really long ones, past the shoulders. I recommend that for you — you have such pretty red hair, but it would even look nicer if you wore a veil over it. I think the long kind would be best for you.”
If the anecdote is true, it isn’t bad. I don’t think it is true. All that is clear from this paragraph is the woman is completely self-absorbed and has seen an opportunity to tell everyone she has “pretty red hair.” This reads like bad dialogue in a self-published e-book. Did I mention she’s an author on Amazon?
Most disturbing about this conversation was his effort to make repression sound positive. Of course it made no sense that my hair would somehow look better if people couldn’t see it. Indignant, I asked him to explain why he thought I should consider covering my head.
“Because it’s respectful,” he replied solemnly.
She has great hair! No humility but great hair!
When asked why it was disrespectful to show the hair that God gave me — and why men in church did not have to cover their hair — he was not able to answer. He reacted badly because I challenged his authority. Anyway, I had no intention of listening. I knew I was free to take my belief in God elsewhere. I never returned to that church afterwards.
She’s still not finished mentioning her hair and I doubt this is true. I found this putting a few words into a search engine in less than a minute. I’m sure he was able to answer her and that she just didn’t like the answer. I doubt anybody much cared that she didn’t return.
I don’t imagine she considers the Bible to be authoritative but St. Paul in 1 Corinthians 11:4-5 states, “Any man who prays or prophesies with something on his head disgraces his head, but any woman who prays or prophesies with her head unveiled disgraces her head—it is one and the same thing as having her head shaved.”
The priest’s attitude towards veiling women is typical of Latin Mass cultists. They seem to believe that women look better in church when people can’t see them. They try to sell the veil to girls as a symbol of feminine piety. They hold that covering up and hiding yourself is beautiful although such a practice is the very opposite of natural beauty.
Ultimately, it doesn’t matter how pretty, lacy or colorful the veils may seem to potential wearers — the veils are meant to conceal female beauty and prevent people from noticing women. By promoting the veil, Latin Mass fundamentalists rob women of freedom, while trying to make it seem like a liberating choice. Their attitude is not much different from religious extremists in the Middle East and Asia.
Given such practices, it should come as no surprise that a contingent of men active within the sectarian Latin Mass environment have sexist worldviews. These types believe they are superior to women simply because they are male.
A lot more assertions and still no arguments. Again, all of her experiences have been unpleasant at their worst yet she compares them to the Spanish Inquisition and describes them as torture and awful mistreatment. She can’t even back up her anecdotes!
I cite two examples to support my view. One occasion that remains burned into my memory was when I attended Mass at a Catholic university. It was a busy Sunday and my schedule demanded I attend Mass at a particular time. I did not know it was a Latin Mass until I stumbled over the doorstep. The atmosphere was typically medieval. I was surprised to recognize some people there. One of them was a professor who was known to be a chauvinistic person. When I saw his wife, I was shocked — and suddenly realized the ugly extent of his prejudices. His wife was a mere ghost of a woman. She was covered from head to foot. Her dress was so long that it dragged on the floor. Even her entire neck and her hands were covered. She kept her head bowed and always walked behind her husband. She carried a rosary and looked physically weak — almost ill.
Perhaps I spoke to soon. Two examples!
For the first we have a woman who looked sickly according to someone that has already established herself as an unreliable witness.
Usually people look sickly when they are sick. Let’s find out what’s wrong.
The professor, by contrast, looked swaggering and hearty. He strutted around and chatted with others in church as she followed him like a pale shadow. Seeing this, I believed I had witnessed a very dark side to the professor’s spirituality. His religion was a mechanism of abusive control.
I have questions. Did she speak to the professor or his wife to establish any of this? Did she see after the wife’s health at least? Has she given any reason for us to believe this at all? No, no and no. Her first example falls flat and really makes her look nasty and presumptuous.
My second example concerns a younger Catholic age group — many of whom are apparently falling victim to the ultra-traditional Latin Mass ideology promoted in Catholic activity groups and on college campuses. A female acquaintance of mine, about my age, decided to brave the Catholic dating scene — a recipe for disaster, in my personal opinion. Among the stories I heard from her were of traditional Catholic males shopping for wives, asking her and other girls, “Are you willing to be veiled?” before agreeing to date them. These men did not want to associate with women whom they couldn’t religiously dominate.
Men she met in this traditional Catholic peer group would interview girls about theology before deciding to spend time with them — they were arrogant and believed they were somehow morally superior to the women. Instead of standing up for her own dignity, she decided to cave into the pressure — go to traditional services and start wearing veils. I still don’t understand why she wanted to associate with that group, or why she decided to give in to oppression.
I’m not seeing the problem here. Does her friend have to date these awful men?
As a reminder, I have been quoting her in full. This is just describing something that her friend supposedly did while putting a sinister twist on it. There is no substance to any of this and I suspect her friend was probably really her and I’m not surprised she has trouble with relationships.
It is very unfortunate that younger generations of Catholics seeking to deepen their faith are getting sucked into this vortex of toxic, traditional radicalism. I saw many young families at a Latin Mass recently when I was invited to attend a speaking engagement at a traditional church. I happened to arrive before Mass was quite over — having nowhere else to go before the event, and wishing to receive Communion, I decided to sit in on the Mass. Unsurprisingly I found myself surrounded by veiled women who entertained themselves in between kneeling bouts by casting disapproving glances at my leggings and earrings.
These horrible medieval cultists invited her to speak at their parish and looked at the clothes she was wearing! If they are so stuck in their ways, why would they invite her to speak at all? I certainly wouldn’t have.
It’s quite telling that she was invited to speak and didn’t attend the Mass before her engagement. That would have been the polite thing to do for a normal speaker — especially if they are Catholic as she claims to be. She treats the central act of worship in the Catholic Church as something she went to because there was nothing better to do.
Looking around, I was astonished to see many college-aged men and women among the crowd. The priests seemed to be in their 30s. Clearly these people were too young to remember times before Vatican II. Yet something had drawn them here. Parental influence? Doubtful. It seemed to be a shared spirit of ultra-conservatism. I found it frightening to reflect on how the closed, Latin Mass mindset had managed to replicate itself over time and spread like a virus.
It is worth pointing out that most of her anecdotes are just her interpretations of what she sees. She isn’t speaking to most of these people. She doesn’t know what they are actually thinking and certainly not what is in their hearts. The only people given a voice speak like characters in a bad fiction book and of course aren’t able to best the protagonist (her) in argument.
To another point, that the Latin Mass trends much younger compared to the sad, spotted sea of grey at most parishes indicates they are much healthier communities despite her claims to the contrary.
Unsurprisingly, while there I had another memorably bad experience. I asked to receive Communion in the hands. Most traditional-type priests I’d encountered in my lifetime would give me the Eucharist in the hands. Not this pastor. He literally made a scene at the altar and jerked the Eucharist away from me when I reached out to receive it — as if my hands would contaminate the very Jesus who, according to the Catholic faith, seeks Communion with my soul. I seriously considered walking out of the church at that point, but decided to receive the Eucharist instead since I wanted to pray. After Mass I gave the priests a piece of my mind.
Clericalism defined the response I received. When I informed an assisting priest that the pastor had been very rude to me at the altar and asked that my views be relayed, he replied: “I won’t throw our pastor under the bus. He’s the pastor. I refuse to tell him to correct his behavior,” the priest said.
I reminded him that, as a priest, he was supposed to be of service and value my feedback as a believer. The priest took a step back and looked at me in astonishment, as if the notion of service had never occurred to him. “Very well. I’ll tell the pastor what you said,” he said condescendingly. “But I don’t think he did anything wrong.”
I’ve actually met someone who had the same experience and they were just as unreasonable about it. If you don’t want to receive Communion as it has almost universally been practiced until very, very recently then don’t go to Latin Mass. And I’m sure the priest in this case displayed far more grace and humility towards the woman than she deserved. You can tell by the amateur fiction at the end.
His attitude was a trademark example of the culture within the Catholic Church that encourages abuse. His first reaction was to default to absolute loyalty to his pastor, then dismiss my views. When pressed further, he flat-out denied all wrongdoing. To clericalists, complainers are always the problem — not those who belong to the herd, and certainly not clergy.
She has presented absolutely no evidence of any abuse towards her. This article is a disgraceful and insulting to people who truly have suffered at the hands of clergy and employees in Catholic institutions.
With feudalistic rigidity, the priest argued in defense of his pastor against the traditions of the “novus ordo”—a derogatory term used by Latin Mass cultists to denote regular English-language Masses. He said the Masses I regularly attended were invented “only 40 years ago” — as if that devalued them somehow —and insisted they were only “allowed to exist, but not standardly recommended.” He claimed the church only allowed Communion in the hands “in extreme cases.” Of course, I know this is not true. He capped his radical fundamentalist arguments by saying the Latin Mass is a solemn rite equal to Byzantine and Coptic rites and that rules cannot be changed for anyone. He accused me of being “rude” by expecting them “to change their rites.”
Novus ordo means “new order” and is short for “new order of the Mass”. If she thinks this is derogatory, then that says more about her than those she is speaking to. I doubt her reported speech from the priest is accurate but he isn’t wrong about Communion in the hand and she would know that if she really had the facts on her side.
I feel it necessary to point out — lest readers be confused by his illogicality — that the Byzantine and Coptic rites originate in the traditions of distinct Catholic churches in foreign countries. The Latin Mass, by contrast, is merely an extinct model of tradition practiced in the United States and other countries, and was never a separate church nor imported from a foreign country. Therefore the Latin Mass can be compared to Coptic and Byzantine churches as much as apples can be compared to oranges. No ancient Romans or native Latin speakers will be disenfranchised by changes made to the Latin Mass — just hardliners unable to let go of their particular ideology.
This is the closest she has to an argument in the whole piece and it falls completely flat. The Latin Mass is still recognised by the church. It has existed for over a millennium and is not now (and wasn’t ever before), “extinct”. Most Masses in the vernacular don’t even follow the rubrics set out by the Second Vatican Council which also didn’t allow for the Communion in the hand that she believes is her right. This whole paragraph could easily be broken down and fisked in a separate post.
What I gained from this experience was a deeper recognition of how the Latin Mass foments the clericalist culture within the Catholic Church that Pope Francis is actively working to change.
In his homily earlier last month, Pope Francis warned Catholics against hypocrisy. He described hypocrisy as “appearing one way, but acting in another,” and said that a hypocritical attitude “always kills.”
Jesus did not tolerate hypocrisy, according to Pope Francis, but enjoyed unmasking it. “A Christian who does not know how to accuse himself is not a good Christian,” the pope said.
A Christian who does not know how to accuse herself. Quite apt.
The intolerant atmosphere of the Latin Mass stands in stark contrast to Pope Francis’s description of what the Catholic Church is supposed to be. “The church is not a fortress, but a tent capable of expanding and offering access to everyone,” said Pope Francis. “The church is ‘going out’ or it is not church, either it is walking, always widening its room so that all may enter or else it is not church.”
Compassion defines true Catholicism. Radical traditionalists who cling to the pomp, ceremony and narrow-minded rituals of outdated Latin practices would do well to follow the advice of Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 9: “Go and learn the meaning of the words, ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice.’ “
And the article comes to a close. In summary, she doesn’t like Latin Mass or people who attend. She has beautiful red hair that needs no veil. She has an uncanny ability to know peoples thoughts and motivations — even without speaking or interacting with them. She believes one case of strict penance, incense, veils, beautiful vestments and people politely disagreeing with her are evidence of awful mistreatment and torture comparable with the Spanish Inquisition. Everything is and must be about her and her beautiful red hair. Did I mention her hair?
Now I believe without meeting or interacting with her that she is a living, breathing case of female solipsism.
It is really embarrassing that this was published even in an online magazine like this. I really hope the editor didn’t read it before it was published because it would be far worse to admit to having read it and then approved it for publication.
On a final note, if the Latin Mass was suppressed, she would no doubt be delighted but the vast majority of people who attend Latin Mass would still go to the New Order Mass to be at the foot of the cross with Jesus Christ. If the new Mass was suppressed, I doubt she or many people like her would attend Mass or even stay in the church. I’d absolutely be willing to bet on it too.
Update: There was a response written much closer to the original articles publication on the Catholic World Report website by Dr. Adam A. J. DeVille. It wasn’t as in-depth as I went as he thought it a waste of time. I don’t disagree even though I did spend the time doing it. It is interesting that he suspected like me that her complaints were either made-up or exaggerated.